► Hello, I was and still am a big fan of Toše. After I found out about his death, honestly, at first glance, in addition to disbelief, it was difficult to accept his death, let alone all the information that came from the entire Balkans. Namely, after some time I started following all the articles related to Toše and I have to admit that I found a lot of things illogical, insufficiently explained and clarified for the death of such a great man. I thought it was due to journalistic and television policy, which wants to convey the story to the public as soon as possible, regardless of its veracity.
(1.) The first claim, which I observed, was the vehicle of an undamaged truck versus a destroyed VW Touareg. The VW Touareg does not belong to the 'limousine' line of cars, but to the 'off-road SUV', which means that due to its height, it could not have stuck under the truck, and the truck could not have towed it, as claimed by the driver Georgij Georgijevski. If it had happened according to his claims, the vehicle would not have been destroyed only on the passenger's side, but again and contradictory if it had been according to his claims, then the truck vehicle would have had to be at least 'slightly' destroyed from the rear, e.g. registration that would then fall off, a dent, scratches or at least a remnant of the WV silver paint.
(2.) The second claim, that the truck appeared in only one photo that was released to the public, and that same photo showed a car passing the truck. Perhaps the majority would think, what does the other car have to do with the truck in the foreground that is responsible for Toše's death, and in that way the attention was diverted to the passing car. Namely, it would not be strange if that same truck was standing on the stop lane when the police and the so-called "eyewitness", and everything was recorded with photographs, but the truck apparently only appeared at the beginning while the vehicles were still passing, which is also contradictory to our provisions of the Law on Road Traffic Safety, in the Republic of Croatia.
(3.) The third claim, where are the witnesses?! The traffic accident did not happen on a road with little traffic, but on the highway, one of the busiest routes in Croatia. It is interesting that there is not a single person as an additional witness besides the truck driver himself, and the remaining two living witnesses who participated in the traffic accident, and were even inside the destroyed VW Touareg, do not remember anything. According to our legislation, everyone is obliged to stop at the scene of a traffic accident and help the victims. Does it even matter what the law dictates, when there should be a principle of humanity in every human being, besides, if there was no humanity at that moment, there was Toše's SUV with the words Toše visible on it, so if not out of humanity, there would be at least one a person who would stop out of curiosity and find out what happened to Toše's car.
This leads me to (4.)
The fourth claim, who called the police, because both drivers are not Croatian citizens?! So even if someone contacted that a traffic accident had occurred, the police had to find that person as a witness during the investigation.
(5.) The fifth claim, since I live in the first neighboring town (Novska) from Nova Gradiška, I know that their hospital does not have a pathology department, and therefore I wonder how the autopsy was validly performed and whether it was performed at all because Toša's body was that on the same day in the evening, transported to Macedonia, and according to our law, since there was a traffic accident with fatal consequences, the body must be kept for a week and the autopsy must be performed by specialist pathologists. "When a death occurs in a traffic accident, the ambulance comes out, declares the death, and the police issue a report, and the body is transported to forensic medicine and forensics for an autopsy. The family or a close family member picks up the deceased in the next few days, but since it was a traffic accident with fatal consequences, an autopsy must be performed, which delays the pick-up for at least a few days while the entire procedure is carried out. In Croatia, this often lasts for a week''.
(6.) Sixth claim, everything happened too fast, that there was no time to ask what really happened. When I tried to find out some new news via the Internet, investigation, trials, anything, there were only old posts from the time of Toše's death. My first thought was, it's sad that people forget all that so quickly and don't ask themselves what the truth is in the end. They accepted that Toše is no more, but no one told the true story, based on solid evidence, what really happened, but Toše's CD appeared in English, which again diverted attention from finding out the truth. And what's more, the media don't write about such a big star who tried to unite the Balkans even after his death.
Contradiction of statements:
1. The driver fell asleep vs. 20 minutes before he stopped at the rest area
2. Speed 171 Km/h (Croatian expertise) vs. 141 Km/h (Macedonia)
3. Toše tied with a seat belt (Croatian expert opinion) vs. Toše was not tied because he was lying on the lowered seat.
4. Toše died instantly during the impact vs. Toše died an hour later due to severe injuries.
5. Expertise in Croatian. stated brake damage vs. Macedonia ordered the delivery of the vehicle due to a detailed expert examination, BUT instead of concrete answers, all that remained was a rebuttal from the Croatian side.
There is too much contradiction and mystery. I almost wanted to see his concert in Belgrade and while I was watching it again, I wondered if they had come to some new knowledge...
Deep down I know that Toše is not guilty and that he was "a goldfish that got lost in the cold ocean because they promised her freedom without borders" (metaphorically speaking).
Greetings.
